Abstract
Purpose of this study is to provide a pragmatic view of how speech acts are utilized in today's society. More specifically, it explores speech acts as social actions rather than merely as means of communicating knowledge. It examines how people perform Speech acts of asserting, requesting, promising, and expressing their attitudes through language in real-world communicative events, drawing on speech act theory as proposed by Austin and Searle. To conduct such study, a qualitative discourse analytic methodology was used to analyze a selection of written samples of contemporary English discourse from three different types of source material: media-based texts (such as newspapers and magazines), political speeches, and various face-to-face interactions. Particular attention was put on impact of contextual factors have on illocutionary force of speech acts and frequency with which they occur in form of indirect speech acts in today's world. The findings suggest that a large portion of contemporary English discourse relies upon pragmatic inference (from context of utterance), contextual reference (related to what is understood from texts), and being provided with indirect means of accomplishing communication effectively. Through presenting a description of how language functions within this pragmatic and participatory framework, this study contributes to understand and develop theories within fields of pragmatics and discourse studies, as well as provide information to utilized by applied linguists and those working with languages in educational system.
References
- Abid, K. K. (2023). A pragmatic analysis of CNN news headlines on Ukraine and Russian war, Journal of AlMaarif University College. 34(3), 356-368. https://doi.org/10.51345/.v34i3.755.g392
- Al-Saedi, H.T.J., & Jabbar, K. W. (2020). A pragmatic study of newspaper headlines in media discourse: Iraq as a case study. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(3), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.3.6
- Asher, N. (2007). Dynamic discourse semantics for embedded speech acts. John Searle’s philosophy of language, 2011-244.
- Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.
- Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11(4), 430-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(79)90020-3
- Culpeper, J., & Archer, D. (2008). Requests and directness in Early Modern English trial proceedings and play texts, 1640–1760. Speech acts in the history of English, 176, 45-84.
- Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. Routledge.
- Deamer, F. (2020). Why do we talk to ourselves? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 12(2), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-020-00487-5
- Degen, J. (2022). The rational speech act framework. Annual Review of Linguistics, 9(1), 519-540. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-010811
- Diner, L. (2020). Errors analysis of directive speech act and politeness strategy in kaiwa chukyu learning. Lingua Cultura, 14(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.21512/1c.v14i1.6278
- Dylgjeri, A. (2017). Analysis of speech acts in political speeches. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 2(2), 19–26. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4016-2701
- Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
- Ludwig, K. (2020). What are group speech acts? Language & Communication, 70, 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.04.004
- Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
- Muhsen, R. A. I., & Smeer, I. H. (2022). A pragmatic analysis of speech acts in Reagan’s first inaugural speech. Al-Adab Journal, 140, 47-64. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i140.3636
- Saud, W. I. (2024). Speech act of request: A contrastive study between EFL and ESL undergraduate students. Journal of the College of Languages, 50, 33-58. https://doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2024.0.50.0033
- Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
- Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.
- Tanduk, R. (2023). Pragmatic aspects of speech acts: A cross-linguistic perspective. English Review Journal of English Education, 11(3). 881-890. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i3.8762
- Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Longman.
- Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Download this PDF file
Statistics
How to Cite
Copyright and Licensing

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







