A Pragmatic Analysis of Speech Acts in Contemporary English Discourse

Section: Article
Published
Jun 1, 2026
Pages
334-352

Abstract

Purpose of this study is to provide a pragmatic view of how speech acts are utilized in today's society. More specifically, it explores speech acts as social actions rather than merely as means of communicating knowledge. It examines how people perform  Speech acts of asserting, requesting, promising, and expressing their attitudes through language in real-world communicative events, drawing on speech act theory as proposed by Austin and Searle. To conduct such study, a qualitative discourse analytic methodology was used to analyze a selection of written samples of contemporary English discourse from three different types of source material: media-based texts (such as newspapers and magazines), political speeches, and various face-to-face interactions. Particular attention was put on impact of contextual factors have on  illocutionary force of speech acts and  frequency with which they occur in  form of indirect speech acts in today's world. The findings suggest that a large portion of contemporary English discourse relies upon pragmatic inference (from  context of  utterance), contextual reference (related to what is understood from  texts), and being provided with indirect means of accomplishing communication effectively. Through  presenting a description of how language functions within this pragmatic and participatory framework, this study contributes to  understand and develop  theories within  fields of pragmatics and discourse studies, as well as provide information to utilized by applied linguists and those working with languages in educational system.

References

  1. Abid, K. K. (2023). A pragmatic analysis of CNN news headlines on Ukraine and Russian war, Journal of AlMaarif University College. 34(3), 356-368. https://doi.org/10.51345/.v34i3.755.g392
  2. Al-Saedi, H.T.J., & Jabbar, K. W. (2020). A pragmatic study of newspaper headlines in media discourse: Iraq as a case study. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(3), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.3.6
  3. Asher, N. (2007). Dynamic discourse semantics for embedded speech acts. John Searle’s philosophy of language, 2011-244.
  4. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.
  5. Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11(4), 430-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(79)90020-3
  6. Culpeper, J., & Archer, D. (2008). Requests and directness in Early Modern English trial proceedings and play texts, 1640–1760. Speech acts in the history of English, 176, 45-84.
  7. Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. Routledge.
  8. Deamer, F. (2020). Why do we talk to ourselves? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 12(2), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-020-00487-5
  9. Degen, J. (2022). The rational speech act framework. Annual Review of Linguistics, 9(1), 519-540. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-010811
  10. Diner, L. (2020). Errors analysis of directive speech act and politeness strategy in kaiwa chukyu learning. Lingua Cultura, 14(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.21512/1c.v14i1.6278
  11. Dylgjeri, A. (2017). Analysis of speech acts in political speeches. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 2(2), 19–26. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4016-2701
  12. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Ludwig, K. (2020). What are group speech acts? Language & Communication, 70, 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.04.004
  14. Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
  15. Muhsen, R. A. I., & Smeer, I. H. (2022). A pragmatic analysis of speech acts in Reagan’s first inaugural speech. Al-Adab Journal, 140, 47-64. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i140.3636
  16. Saud, W. I. (2024). Speech act of request: A contrastive study between EFL and ESL undergraduate students. Journal of the College of Languages, 50, 33-58. https://doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2024.0.50.0033
  17. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
  18. Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Tanduk, R. (2023). Pragmatic aspects of speech acts: A cross-linguistic perspective. English Review Journal of English Education, 11(3). 881-890. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i3.8762
  20. Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Longman.
  21. Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Download this PDF file

Statistics

How to Cite

Sattar J. Hashim, Qassim Hussein Salman, & Afraa Shafeeq Jasim. (2026). A Pragmatic Analysis of Speech Acts in Contemporary English Discourse. College of Basic Education Research Journal, 22(2), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.33899/berj.2026.Vol22.Iss2.61509

Author Biographies

Sattar J. Hashim (Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Directorate of Research and Development)

A lecturer, translator, researcher and author at Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research/ Directorate of Research and Development. He received his M.A. in 2021 from University of Karabuk, Turkey. His main research interests are, but not limited to: Linguistics, Applied Linguistics, and Discourse Analysis. 

Qassim Hussein Salman (Department of English Language, College of Arts, University of Samarra)

A Lecturer Assistant at the Department of English Language, College of Arts, University of Samarra. His main research interests are, but not limited to: Linguistics, Applied Linguistics, and Discourse Analysis.

Afraa Shafeeq Jasim (Department of Economics, College of Administration and Economics, University of Samarra)

A Lecturer Assistant Department of Economics, College of Administration and Economics, University of Samarra. Her main research Interests are, but not limited to: Linguistics, Applied Linguistics, and Discourse Analysis. 

Copyright and Licensing