Investigating the Types of Assessment Used by EFL University Teachers in the Productive Skills
Abstract
In recent years, researchers focus on finding out what types of assessment used by EFL university teachers to improve the teaching methods. In this line, the present study tries to investigate the types of assessment used by EFL university teachers when assessing the productive skills. As such, the following research questions are formulated (1) “Do EFL teachers follow summative or formative assessment when assessing the productive skills ? (2) What are the major aspects of productive skills followed by EFL teachers in assessing speaking and writing? (3) What are the major activities of productive skills followed by EFL teachers in assessing speaking and writing? and (4) What are the major barriers that EFL teachers face while assessing the productive skills?”. It is hypothesized that (1) EFL teachers follow both types of assessment when assessing speaking and writing skills, (2) EFL teachers assess fluency, accuracy, content , and organizational skills When assessing both speaking and writing, (3) EFL teachers follow specific strategies in assessing speaking and they assess writing through the subjects of essay and composition writing, and (4) the large number of students and time constrain form the main barriers in assessing speaking and writing. To collect data, two semi-structured interviews are used. One address speaking assessment and the other addresses writing assessment. The results show that EFL university teachers follow both types of assessment in assessing the productive skills. They also show that teachers focus on the significant speaking and writing aspects; the most important activities that support the teachers’ way of assessment.
References
- Al-Gharabally, M. (2015). The writing difficulties faced by L2 learners and how to minimize them. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 3(5), 42-49.
- Aslanoglu, A., E. (2022). Examining the effect of peer and self-assessment practices on writing skills. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9 (special issue), 179-196.
- Baht, B., A. (2019). Formative and summative evaluation techniques for improvement of learning process. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 7(50), 776- 785.
- Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Berkshire: Open University Press
- Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford: OUP.
- Burke, K. (2010) Balanced Assessment: From Formative to Summative. USA: Tree Press.
- Cameron, Lynne. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge University Press
- Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B. & Turner, L.A. (2020). Research Methods, Design and Analysis (13th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
- Covill, A., E. (2010). Comparing peer review and self- review as ways to improve college students' writing. Journal of Literacy Research, 24(3), 199-226.
- Duff, P. (2018). Case study research in applied linguistics. In Litosseliti, L. (ed.). Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Dӧrntei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: OUP.
- Fallows, S. & Chandramohan, B. (2001). Multiple approaches to assessment: reflections on the use of tutor, peer and self- assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 229-246.
- Hossain, M., I. (2015). Teaching productive skills to the Students: A secondary level scenario. (A Published M.A Thesis, Bangladesh).
- Iliya, A. (2014). Formative and summative assessment in educational enterprise. Journal of Education Practice, 15 (20), 111-118.
- Lambert, D. &. Lines. D. (2016). Understanding assessment: purposes, perceptions, practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
- Latifa, L. (2017). The impact of peer assessment on enhancing learners’ writing proficiency: the case of third year students at the university of 8 Mai 1945, Guelma. A Published M.A. Thesis.
- Leach, L. (2012). Optional self-assessment: some tensions and dilemmas. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.515013.
- Moss, C. M., and Brookhart, S. M. (2019). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom: a guide for instructional leaders. Alexandria: ASCD Publisher.
- Richards, J., C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking: from theory to practice. Singapore: Regional Language Center.
- Richards, J., C., & Schmidt, R., (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (4th ed.). London: Pearson Longman.
- Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
- Taras, M. (2005). Assessment-summative and formative–some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466-478.
- Wafubwa , R. (2020). Role of formative assessment in improving students’ motivation, engagement, and achievement: a systematic review of literature. International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation, 28 (1), 17-31.
- Wininger, S. R. (2005). Using your tests to teach: formative and summative assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 32(3), 164–166.
Download this PDF file
Statistics
How to Cite
Copyright and Licensing

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






